СПИСОК ПУБЛІКАЦІЙ ЗДОБУВАЧА ЗА ТЕМОЮ ДИСЕРТАЦІЇ

які засвідчують основні наукові результати дисертації:

1. Корецький І. О. Змагальність і принцип змагальності в судочинстві: проблеми співвідношення. Боротьба з організованою злочинністю і корупцією (теорія і практика).

2. Koretsky I. O. The court's role in ensuring the principle of adversarial in administrative courts. Visegrad journal on human rights. Bratislava, 2015. № 6/2. P. 34-38.

3. Корецький І. О. Змагальні сторони в адміністративному судочинстві. Науковий вісник публічного та приватного права. Київ, 2016. № 2. С. 123-129.

4. Корецький І. О. Доказування як засіб доведення позиції сторін в адміністративному судочинстві. Науковий вісник публічного та приватного права. Київ, 2016. №1. С. 56-62.

5. Корецький І. О. Принцип змагальності в системі принципів адміністративного судочинства. Науковий вісник публічного та приватного права. Київ, 2017. № 1. С. 66-72.

6. Корецький І. О., Братель С. Г. Місце процесуальної практики європейського суду з прав людини в адміністративному судочинстві. Підприємництво, господарство і право. Київ, 2017. № 4. С. 88-96.

які засвідчують апробацію матеріалів дисертації:

7. Корецький І. О. Поняття доказування в адміністративному судочинстві. Рівень ефективності та необхідності впливу юридичної науки на нормотворчу діяльність та юридичну практику, матеріали міжн. наук.-прак. конф. (Донецьк, 7-8 берез. 2014 р.). Донецьк: Східноукраїнська наукова юридична організація, 2014. С. 67-69.

8. Корецький І. О. Реалізація принципу змагальності судами.

Актуальні питання та проблеми правового регулювання суспільних відносин: матеріали міжн. наук.-прак. конф. (Дніпропетровськ, 4-5 квіт. 2014 р.). Дніпропетровськ: ГО «Правовий світ», 2014. С. 98-99.

9. Корецький І. О. Процесуальні строки в адміністративному

судочинстві. Актуальні питання та проблеми правового регулювання суспільних відносин: матеріали міжн.

10. Корецький І. О. Співвідношення понять «сфера публічно-правових відносин» та «спір щодо його прав та обов’язків цивільного характеру». Сучасні проблеми правової системи та державотворення в Україні: матеріали міжн. наук.-прак. конф. (Запоріжжя, 27-28 лют. 2015 р.). Запоріжжя: Запорізька міська громадська організація «Істина», 2015. С. 74 - 76.

11. Корецький І. О. Обов’язкові системо утворюючі елементи

змагальності. Сучасні правові системи світу в умовах глобалізації: реалії та

перспективи: матеріали міжн. наук.-прак. конф. (Київ, 11-12 берез. 2016 р.). Київ: Центр правових наукових досліджень, 2016. С. 101-102.

12. Корецький І. О. Поняття принципу змагальності. Пріоритети розвитку юридичних наук у ХХІ столітті: матеріали міжн. наук.-прак. конф. (Одеса, 8-9 квіт. 2016 р.). Одеса: ГО «Причорноморська фундація права», 2016. С. 94-95.

13. Корецький І. О. Поняття та ознаки суб’єктів владних повноважень. Пріоритетні напрями розвитку сучасної юридичної науки: матеріали міжн. наук.-прак. конф. (Харків, 16-17 верес. 2016 р.). Харків: ГО «Асоціація аспірантів-юристів», 2016. С. 50-52.

14. Корецький І. О. Застосування практики європейського суду з прав людини в адміністративному судочинстві. Сучасні наукові дослідження представників юридичної науки - прогрес законодавства України майбутнього: матеріали міжн. наук.-прак. конф. (Дніпро, 13-14 січ. 2017 р.) Дніпро: ГО «Правовий світ», 2017. С. 57-58.

15. Корецький І. О. Загальні принципи адміністративного судочинства. Право, суспільство і держава: форми взаємодії: матеріали міжн. наук.-прак. конф. (Київ, 13-14 січ. 2017 р.). Київ: Центр правових наукових досліджень, 2017. С. 68-69.

16. Корецький І. О., Братель С. Г. Особливості засобів доказування в адміністративному судочинстві. Сутність та значення впливу законодавства на розвиток суспільних відносин: матеріали міжн. наук.-прак. конф. (Одеса, 10-11 берез.

SUMMARY

Koretsky I.O. Principle of Competitiveness of the Parties in the Administrative Proceedings. - Qualifying scientific work on the rights of manuscripts.

Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Law, specialty 12.00.07 «Administrative Law and Process; Financial Law; Information Law». - National Academy of Internal Affairs, Research Institute of Public Law, Kyiv, 2017.

On the basis of the author's research the concept of the principle of the adversarial parties in the administrative legal proceedings and its relation with other principles of the administrative process is analyzed. It is shown that the principles of the administrative legal proceedings are intended to carry out the following functions: regulating of social relations that arise when considering administrative cases by courts; contributing to the systematization of procedural legislation governing the procedure for the implementation of administrative legal proceedings; being of fundamental importance while interpreting norms and filling of gaps in the legal regulation of administrative proceedings; providing of logical construction of the institute of administrative legal proceedings; serving to effective protection and restoring of citizens' rights violated by the authorities and their officials.

When examining the issue of the principle of competition in the system of principles of administrative legal proceedings, it must be taken into account that the combination of the competitive basis of the administrative process with the parties' equality in the process provides discretionary ability to a complete use of the judicial protection of the rights, freedoms and interests of the person who appealed to the administrative court for protection. Objective interdependence and the connection of the principle of competition with the principles of administrative justice is clearly reflected in its ratio to the latter.

The principle of competition is a universal regulatory and governing requirement that is directly enshrined in the rules of procedural law, which ensures such a procedure for the implementation of legal proceedings, in which the court's finding of circumstances relevant to the case, is carried out through the confrontation of subjects of procedural relations in the presentation of circumstances on which they base their claims and objections.

The principle of competition in different types of process has certain peculiarities. In civil, criminal, administrative and economic proceedings, the parties compete for the actual circumstances relevant to the case and the legal qualification of these circumstances. At the same time, they are responsible only for the factual substantiation of their position. The question of the law the court decides independently. Despite the fact that the people involved in the case have the right, and in some cases, are obliged to give a legal substantiation of their claims and objections, the court is not bound by their arguments.

Nowadays the notion of "subject of power" is debatable, although its definition is provided in the Code of Administrative Justice of Ukraine. It is noted that the legislation of Ukraine lacks a unified list of subjects of power, and that is why to determine a certain body as such entity status and the content of its powers should be started with, and that status and powers are established by the relevant regulatory acts that regulate their activities.

In spite of the fact that in cases provided for by law, an administrative case may be instituted not only by the plaintiff, but also by the prosecutor and other persons who are granted the right to protect the rights and freedoms of other

persons, the plaintiff is always a person in defense of whose rights, freedoms and interests an administrative case is started.

A petition in administrative proceedings means an appeal of the participants of the administrative process to the court with the request for assistance in the implementation of the consolidated in the Code of Administrative Proceedings of Ukraine of their procedural rights and duties during the proceedings in a particular administrative case in order to protect their rights, freedoms and interests. The attention is drawn to the fact that the peculiarity of petitions in administrative proceedings is, firstly, the availability of an opportunity to petition any participant in the administrative process, and not only the parties; secondly, the petition is always brought to court and only the court is authorized to decide on its further realization - whether to satisfy it or not.

One of the powers of the court is the application by the authorities of the National Police of a properly summoned person whose personal participation is recognized by the court compulsory, a witness who, without good reason, did not arrive in the court session or did not report the reasons for non-arrival, with the reimbursement to the state's income of the costs of his implementation. In connection with the lack of specialized legislation regulating the work of the police, the normative settlement of this issue is proposed to supplement Part 1 of Art. 23 of the Law of Ukraine "On National Police", clause 9-1 of the following: "9-1) in cases and in accordance with the procedure established by law, upon a motivated decision of the authorized body or official, carries out the drive of the persons to whom it is applied."

On the basis of the analysis of different approaches, the author's definition of proving in administrative legal proceedings is suggested. It is offered to understand proving in administrative legal proceedings as the activity of the subjects of proving, which is regulated by the administrative-procedural norms, aimed at collecting, submitting, evaluating, reviewing, providing, researching, demanding or temporarily withdrawing evidence in order to find out the objective truth and fair solution to a public-legal dispute.

One of the factors in the implementation of the principle of competition between the parties, taking into account the procedural practice of the European Court of Human Rights, is the provision on the length of the trial. In order to establish a reasonable duration of a particular case in national judicial authorities, the European Court takes into account in its practice several defining criteria, in particular: the complexity of the case; the behavior of the applicant, that is, the person who applied for the protection of his or her rights; the work of the court and other state bodies of the state during the consideration of the case; importance of the subject matter for the applicant.

Key words: administrative justice, competition, the principle of competition, the parties, subject of authority, administrative court, proving.

LIST OF SHOLAR'S PUBLICATIONS main scientific results of the thesis:

1. Koretsky I.O. Competition and the principle of competition in the legal process: the problem of correlation. Fighting Organized Crime and Corruption (theory and practice). Kyiv, 2015. No. 2. S. 33-38.

2. Koretsky I.O. The court's role in ensuring the principle of adversarial in administrative courts. Visegrad journal on human rights. Bratislava, 2015. No. 6/2. Pp. 34-38.

3. Koretskii I.O. Competitive parties in administrative proceedings. Scientific Bulletin of Public and Private Law. Kyiv, 2016. No. 2. P. 123-129.

4. Koretskii I.O. Proof as a means of proving the position of the parties in the administrative proceedings. Scientific Bulletin of Public and Private Law. Kyiv, 2016. No. 1. Pp. 56-62.

5. Koretskii I.O. The principle of competition in the system of principles of administrative justice. Scientific Bulletin of Public and Private Law. Kyiv, 2017. No. 1. P. 66-72.

6. Koretskii I.O., Bratel S.G. The place of procedural practice of the European court on human rights in administrative legal proceedings. Entrepreneurship, economy and law. Kyiv, 2017. No. 4, pp. 88-96.

publications of thesis approbation:

7. Koretsky I.O. The concept of proof in administrative proceedings. The level of efficiency and necessity of the influence of legal science on normative activity and legal practice: materials inter. sciences. conf. (Donetsk, 7-8 March 2014). Donetsk: East-Ukrainian Scientific Law Organization, 2014. pp. 67-69.

8. Koretskii I.O. Realization of the principle of competition by courts. Topical Issues and Problems of Legal Regulation of Public Relations: Materials of International Relations. sciences. conf. (Dnipropetrovsk, April 4-5, 2014). Dnipropetrovsk: NGO "Legal world", 2014. pp. 98-99.

9. Koretskii I.O. Procedural time in administrative proceedings. Topical Issues and Problems of Legal Regulation of Public Relations: Materials of International Relations. sciences. conf. (Dnipropetrovsk, November 6-7, 2015). Dnipropetrovsk: NGO "Legal world", 2015. pp. 48-49.

10. Koretsky I.O. Value of concepts "sphere of public-legal relations" and "dispute over its rights and duties of a civil character". Modern Problems of the Legal System and State Building in Ukraine: Materials of International Relations. sciences. conf. (Zaporizhzhya, February 27-28, 2015). Zaporozhye: Zaporizhzhya city public organization "Truth", 2015. p. 74-76.

11. Koretsky I.O. Compulsory systems that create the elements of competition. Modern legal systems of the world in the conditions of globalization: realities and prospects: materials intern. sciences. conf. (Kyiv, 11-12 March 2016). Kyiv: Center for Legal Research, 2016. pp. 101-102.

12. Koretsky I.O. Concept of the principle of competition. Priorities of the development of legal sciences in the XXI century: materials of the Inter. sciences. conf. (Odessa, April 8-9, 2016). Odessa: NGO "Black Sea Fund of Law", 2016. pp. 94-95.

13. Koretsky I.O. Concepts and features of subjects of power. Priority directions of development of modern legal science: materials intern. sciences. conf. (Kharkiv, September 16-17, 2016). Kharkiv: NGO "Association of Postgraduate Lawyers", 2016. S. 50-52.

14. Koretskii I.O. Application of the practice of the European Court of Human Rights in administrative proceedings. Modern scientific researches of representatives of legal science - progress of the legislation of Ukraine of the future: materials intern. sciences. conf. (Dnipro, January 13-14, 2017) Dnipro: NGO "Legal world", 2017. pp. 57-58.

15. Koretsky I.O. General principles of administrative legal proceedings. Right, society and state: forms of interaction: materials inter. sciences. conf. (Kyiv, January 13-14, 2017). Kyiv: Center for Legal Research, 2017. pp. 68-69.

16. Koretskii I.O., Bratel S.G. Features of means of proof in administrative proceedings. The essence and significance of the legislation's influence on the development of social relations: materials inter. sciences. conf. (Odessa,

10-11 March 2017) Odessa: NGO "Black Sea Fund of Law", 2017.